“The Morning Rush” talks with Eric Bachman about employment discrimination case against NFL

employment discrimination lawyer; whistleblower lawyer; Bachman Law; Eric Bachman

As the fallout from the employment discrimination case against the NFL regarding Black head coaches continues to unfold, Newsy’s Morning Rush spoke with Bachman Law founder Eric Bachman for his analysis on the lawsuit. The topics ranged from the Rooney Rule to the likelihood that a federal court may certify Flores’s employment discrimination claims as a class action case.

Also, Bachman talked about whether Flores may get access to other information that may shed light on his discrimination claims, including racist emails like those from Jon Gruden.

The glaring disparity between the number of Black players in the NFL and the dearth of Black coaches and executives in the league and its impact on Flores’s employment discrimination case were also reviewed.

Legal elements of an employment discrimination case against an NFL team

Flores’s lawsuit asserts that the NFL and various teams violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and 42 U.SC. section 1981, as well as other laws. The case is proceeding as a class action but the legal elements to prove an individual race discrimination case are also instructive.

To prove intentional promotion discrimination under Title VII or Section 1981, a Black NFL head coach candidate must first show that:

  • they are a member of a protected class;
  • they applied for and were qualified for the head coach position; and
  • after they were rejected, the position remained open or was filled by a person with similar qualifications.

Many unsuccessful Black head coach candidates will probably meet this initial (prima facie) case of discrimination. The next step is for the NFL team to state a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for why it did not select the Black coach for the job. It is nearly unheard of for an employer to not provide some explanation for why it did not hire someone.

employment discrimination lawyer; Bachman Law; Eric BachmanAs a result, where the rubber hits the road in these cases is finding out whether the rejected candidate can show that the team’s reason for its decision was a sham for impermissible discrimination and/or that the explanation is unworthy of credence. See, e.g., Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. 530 U.S. 133, 148 (2000).

Proving that an NFL’s team claimed reason for not hiring a Black head coach is actually a pretext for discrimination can take a variety of forms. For example:

  • Evidence that the rejected coach was substantially better qualified than the coach selected;
  • White coaches with similar experience and background have been given better opportunities or have been “groomed” to be hired as a head coach;
  • Shifting and inconsistent reasons for not hiring the Black coach are offered by the team;
  • The team’s failure to follow its normal hiring protocols in selecting the head coach; and
  • Statistical evidence related to the team’s and/or the NFL’s history of not hiring Black coaches

This last type of evidence could be particularly helpful in proving a Title VII race discrimination claim. Statistical data and comparative information about an NFL team’s previous hiring decisions for the head coach job can provide necessary background and historical context for how a particular decision was made.

There will be a lot to unpack in this case and additional analysis will be forthcoming.

If you have experienced employment discrimination or whistleblower retaliation, call a top rated employment attorney at (202) 769-1681, or start your preliminary consultation online

Scroll to Top